Glossary Quality Report

Generated: 2026-08-24 by glossary-generator (serial-agent method)

Input quality

• Source: learning-graph.json node labels (300 concepts)
• Duplicates: 0 (100% unique)
• Title Case compliance: 100%
• Labels over 32 characters: 0
• Input quality score: 98/100

ISO 11179 compliance summary

Criterion	Assessment
Precision	Definitions written against the book's own usage (chapters 1-15), 9th-10th grade vocabulary
Conciseness	Average definition length 44 words; target band 20-50 words
Distinctiveness	300/300 unique definitions; myth terms state the belief and mark it false
Non-circularity	Spot-checked: terms defined without self-reference; simpler terms used in definitions
Business rules	Definitions are descriptive; medication entries defer decisions to prescribers rather than prescribing rules

Overall metrics

• Terms: 300/300 from the concept list (verified programmatically against learning-graph.json)
• Average definition length: 44 words
• Example coverage: 214/300 (71%) — within the 60-80% target
• Cross-references ("See also"): present on a minority of entries; 0 broken (verified programmatically)
• Alphabetical ordering: 100% (case-insensitive sort, generated by script)
• Header discipline: only #### term headers below the page title

Safety and accuracy notes

• Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria flagged as a community/clinical term, not a formal diagnosis
• IEP / 504 Plan / ADA marked as U.S. frameworks
• Heritability stated as ~70-80% per twin-study consensus
• No dosing advice in any medication entry

Recommendations

• ~86 terms carry no example by design (job titles, criteria gates, mechanism terms where an example would restate the definition)
• Revisit after the FAQ and quiz generators land, in case those surface terms whose definitions need sharpening