Skip to content

Quiz: Treatment Beyond Medication

Test your understanding of non-medication ADHD treatments and how to evaluate treatment claims with these review questions.

1. What does "multimodal treatment" mean in this chapter?

  1. Combining several kinds of intervention — such as medication, skills-based therapy, family training, and lifestyle foundations — rather than relying on one alone
  2. Using only medication, since guidelines say it's the single most effective option
  3. Switching between different medications until one works
  4. Treating only the co-occurring conditions and ignoring ADHD itself
Show Answer

The correct answer is A. Multimodal treatment means combining medication (if chosen), skills-based therapy, family training, school or workplace supports, and lifestyle foundations, since no single intervention touches every system ADHD affects. Option B contradicts the chapter's "portfolio, not silver bullet" framing. Option C confuses multimodal treatment with medication titration. Option D wrongly excludes ADHD itself from the treatment plan.

Concept Tested: Multimodal Treatment

See: Chapter 8

2. Why does this chapter treat psychoeducation as a genuine first-line treatment rather than just background reading?

  1. It has no real evidence behind it but is included for completeness
  2. Psychoeducation is only useful after all other treatments have failed
  3. Structured, accurate understanding of ADHD changes behavior directly — parents stop issuing surprise demands, couples stop moralizing forgetfulness — and guidelines list it as a first step of care
  4. It replaces the need for any professional evaluation
Show Answer

The correct answer is C. The chapter argues that accurate models of ADHD directly change behavior — citing the transition tax, delay aversion, and prospective memory examples — and notes guidelines list psychoeducation as a genuine first step, not merely background reading. Option A understates its evidence base. Option B misplaces it as a last resort rather than a first step. Option D overstates its role; it complements, not replaces, evaluation.

Concept Tested: Psychoeducation

See: Chapter 8

3. From lowest to highest, how does this chapter's treatment evidence hierarchy rank types of evidence?

  1. Meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, observational studies, expert opinion, anecdotes and testimonials
  2. Anecdotes and testimonials, expert opinion, observational studies, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses
  3. Randomized controlled trials, anecdotes, meta-analyses, expert opinion, observational studies
  4. All forms of evidence are treated as equally reliable in this hierarchy
Show Answer

The correct answer is B. The chapter ranks anecdotes and testimonials lowest, then expert opinion, then observational studies, then randomized controlled trials, with meta-analyses at the summit. Option A reverses the order. Option C scrambles the ranking so randomized trials and anecdotes are placed inconsistently. Option D directly contradicts the entire point of having a hierarchy.

Concept Tested: Treatment Evidence Hierarchy

See: Chapter 8

4. Why do major guidelines recommend behavioral parent training before medication for preschool-age children with ADHD?

  1. Because medication is unsafe at any age
  2. Because parent training and medication can never be combined later
  3. Because preschoolers do not actually have ADHD
  4. Because parent training has excellent evidence and equips parents with technical skills for redesigning daily structure, making it a strong first step for young children specifically
Show Answer

The correct answer is D. The chapter states parent training's evidence is excellent and describes it as technical training in redesigning daily structure — clear expectations, effective instructions, consistent reinforcement — making it the recommended first step for preschoolers specifically. Option A overstates medication's risk profile beyond what the chapter claims. Option B contradicts the chapter's portfolio approach, which combines interventions over time. Option C contradicts the chapter's premise that preschoolers can have ADHD.

Concept Tested: Behavioral Parent Training

See: Chapter 8

5. What is the honest verdict on neurofeedback, according to this chapter?

  1. It has been thoroughly proven effective in every well-controlled trial
  2. It is dangerous and should never be attempted under any circumstances
  3. Results are mixed, and the better-controlled the trial, the smaller the effect gets — a pattern consistent with placebo-plus-practice rather than specific efficacy
  4. It works identically to medication and can fully replace it
Show Answer

The correct answer is C. The chapter's unsparing summary is that neurofeedback's apparent effects shrink as trial controls improve, especially with sham-feedback comparisons — the classic signature of placebo-plus-practice. Option A reverses the actual pattern of the evidence. Option B overstates safety concerns; the chapter calls it generally safe, just not well-supported as core treatment. Option D contradicts the chapter's explicit warning against using it instead of evidence-based care.

Concept Tested: Neurofeedback Evidence

See: Chapter 8

6. What is the honest verdict on omega-3 supplementation for ADHD, according to this chapter?

  1. Meta-analyses find a real but small benefit — worth discussing as a low-risk add-on, but not a substitute for medication
  2. It has zero effect and should never be considered
  3. It is more effective than any stimulant medication
  4. It is banned by major medical guidelines
Show Answer

The correct answer is A. The chapter gives omega-3 an honest middle verdict: meta-analyses show a real but small benefit, reasonable as a low-risk add-on discussed with a clinician, but nowhere near a medication substitute. Option B understates its documented small effect. Option C dramatically overstates its efficacy compared to stimulants. Option D is not a claim the chapter makes.

Concept Tested: Omega-3 Evidence

See: Chapter 8

7. A college student with ADHD says her main struggle is keeping up with a weekly schedule and remembering deadlines, not underlying anxious thoughts or family conflict. Which approach from this chapter's table best fits her stated need?

  1. Behavioral parent training
  2. Neurofeedback
  3. A supplement stack marketed as a natural focus booster
  4. ADHD coaching, which works on this week's actual logistics, schedules, and accountability
Show Answer

The correct answer is D. The chapter's table matches ADHD coaching to students and adults needing scaffolding and logistics support rather than therapy, which is exactly her stated need. Behavioral parent training (A) targets parents raising children, not the student herself. Neurofeedback (B) has weak controlled evidence and isn't matched to logistics support. A supplement stack (C) is a marketplace claim the chapter warns against, not a matched treatment approach.

Concept Tested: ADHD Coaching

See: Chapter 8

8. A family is considering a marketed "ADHD supplement blend" advertised as "doctor formulated" with many testimonials but no cited studies. Using this chapter's evaluating treatment claims framework, what should they do?

  1. Buy it immediately, since testimonials from real customers are strong evidence
  2. Ask what evidence supports it beyond testimonials, note that US supplements aren't required to prove efficacy before sale, and weigh the cost against stronger-evidence options
  3. Assume the FDA has already verified its effectiveness before allowing it to be sold
  4. Refuse to consider any supplement under any circumstances, regardless of the specific evidence
Show Answer

The correct answer is B. The chapter's framework asks what evidence exists beyond testimonials, reminds readers that US supplements don't need proven efficacy before sale, and weighs cost against the "compared to what" question of stronger-evidence alternatives. Option A treats the weakest evidence tier as strong. Option C misunderstands US supplement regulation, which the chapter explicitly corrects. Option D overcorrects into a blanket rule the chapter doesn't recommend, since it allows omega-3 as a reasonable low-risk add-on.

Concept Tested: Supplement Claims

See: Chapter 8

9. A family starts their child in neurofeedback sessions without deciding in advance what improvement would justify continuing. Based on this chapter's guidance on measuring treatment progress, what should they have done differently?

  1. Define target outcomes and a review date with a real decision in mind — continue, adjust, or stop — before starting, especially for contested treatments like neurofeedback
  2. Nothing; neurofeedback doesn't require any tracking since its evidence is already conclusive
  3. Wait until year two to consider whether it's working
  4. Only judge progress based on how the child feels about the sessions emotionally
Show Answer

The correct answer is A. The chapter specifically recommends pre-committing to target outcomes and a review date before starting contested treatments, deciding in advance what would justify continuing rather than letting sunk cost and hope drive the decision. Option B wrongly assumes neurofeedback's evidence removes the need for tracking. Option C delays evaluation far longer than the chapter's monthly-timescale recommendation. Option D ignores the structured, observable outcomes the chapter calls for.

Concept Tested: Measuring Treatment Progress

See: Chapter 8

10. A clinic advertises a bundled "12-week ADHD reset" combining neurofeedback, a custom supplement stack, and weekly coaching for a high fixed price, citing "hundreds of success stories" as its evidence. Applying this chapter's evidence hierarchy and consumer-training framework, what is the strongest analysis?

  1. Because the bundle includes coaching, which has real value, the entire package is well-supported
  2. Success stories from hundreds of people are equivalent to a randomized controlled trial
  3. The claim rests on testimonial-level evidence, bundles a contested therapy and an unproven supplement with a genuinely useful but unregulated service, and the same money would buy more higher-evidence care if spent separately — the "compared to what" question exposes the real cost
  4. Because the price is high, the treatment must be more effective than lower-cost options
Show Answer

The correct answer is C. The chapter's own worked example of a nearly identical bundle applies exactly this analysis: testimonial-floor evidence, bundling that obscures which component is doing anything, and a "compared to what" question showing the same money buys more higher-evidence care elsewhere. Option A wrongly lets one legitimate component vouch for the whole bundle. Option B conflates the lowest and highest tiers of the evidence hierarchy. Option D assumes price tracks effectiveness, which the chapter never claims.

Concept Tested: Evaluating Treatment Claims

See: Chapter 8